{"id":260,"date":"2004-10-27T08:56:54","date_gmt":"2004-10-26T23:56:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.f00-042.204.183.203.fs-user.net\/blog\/2004\/10\/user-interface-design-for-elections.html"},"modified":"2004-10-27T08:56:54","modified_gmt":"2004-10-26T23:56:54","slug":"user_interface_1","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bookslope.jp\/blog\/2004\/10\/user_interface_1.html","title":{"rendered":"User interface design for elections"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" alt=\"ohio-butterfly.jpg\" src=\"http:\/\/bookslope.jp\/blog\/archives\/ohio-butterfly.jpg\" width=\"300\" height=\"175\" \/><\/p>\n<p>A GNU desktop mechanic<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.sun.com\/roller\/page\/bnitz\/20041026\">http:\/\/blogs.sun.com\/roller\/page\/bnitz\/20041026<\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Evoting software should definitely be open source. Ideally everything from chip design to firmware to the compiler should also be open to public scrutiny. But while it&#8217;s probably obvious to most voters that the above paper ballot is poorly designed, it would be much more difficult to determine whether a computer based solution is flawed. In any case, a physical record of the vote should also be available. Optical cryptography solutions are interesting, but a simple printed name that would be deposited in a locked box would probably be the most cost effective tamper resistant and bribe resistant solution.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>\u3068\u3044\u3046\u3053\u3068\u3067\u3001\u9078\u6319\u306e\u6295\u7968\u7528\u7d19\u306e\u30e6\u30fc\u30b6\u30fc\u30a4\u30f3\u30bf\u30fc\u30d5\u30a7\u30fc\u30b9\u306e\u8a71\u3002<br \/>\n\u3053\u306e\u8a18\u4e8b\u306b\u3088\u308b\u3068\u3001\u5199\u771f\u306e\u3088\u3046\u306b\u3059\u308b\u3068\u30b1\u30ea\u30fc\u6c0f\u3092\u512a\u5148\u3055\u305b\u308b\u3088\u3046\u306b\u306a\u3063\u3066\u3057\u307e\u3046\u3068\u3002<\/p>\n<p>\u307e\u305f\u3001\u305d\u3046\u3044\u3046\u306e\u3092\u3064\u304f\u308b\u3068\u3053\u308d\u304c\u9078\u6319\u306b\u52dd\u3063\u3066\u516c\u306e\u3082\u306e\u3092\u8a55\u4fa1\u3067\u304d\u308b\u306f\u305a\u3082\u306a\u3044\u3093\u3058\u3083\u306a\u3044\u304b\u3068\u3044\u3046\u3088\u3046\u306a\u8a18\u4e8b (\u3060\u3068\u601d\u3046)\u3002\u9593\u9055\u3063\u3066\u305f\u3089\u6307\u6458\u304f\u3060\u3055\u3044\u3002<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A GNU desktop mechanic http:\/\/blogs.sun.com\/roller\/page\/bnitz\/20041026 Evoting software should definitely be o [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[16],"class_list":["post-260","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-study","tag-ui","missing-thumbnail"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bookslope.jp\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/260","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bookslope.jp\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bookslope.jp\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bookslope.jp\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bookslope.jp\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=260"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/bookslope.jp\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/260\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bookslope.jp\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=260"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bookslope.jp\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=260"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bookslope.jp\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=260"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}